|
|
|
Identification of a worthwhile well constrained
problem. |
|
Identification of a problem where you have
interest and competence. |
|
Finding an advisor who is able and willing to
advise you properly. |
|
Finding a project which matches the time and
resources you can devote to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Some level of original input - a simple
literature survey will not suffice. |
|
Needs to be in keeping with a geographical
approach. |
|
Needs to provide some reasonable level of
integration: |
|
Human environmental inter-relationships. |
|
Consideration of scale issues associated with a
specific geographical problem |
|
Application of a novel method to solve a
geographical problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you have not identified a topic as yet you
need urgently to start thinking about it. |
|
Talk to existing advisor, other faculty, fellow
students and ME |
|
May help to think of multiple possibilities |
|
If you have identified a topic you still need
to: |
|
Talk to existing advisor, other faculty, fellow
students and ME |
|
Produce a concise problem statement which
clearly articulates the purpose of the project |
|
|
|
|
Abstract |
|
Scholarly/intellectual context with citations |
|
Clear problem statement |
|
Description as needed of methods, data sources,
analytical techniques, geographic context. |
|
Analysis (qualitative or quantitative) |
|
Results |
|
Implications |
|
Conclusions |
|
Human subjects - beware |
|
|
|
|
|
Crucial need to place your work in a scho;arly
context |
|
Has to be done through citing work of others |
|
What makes a good citation? |
|
Refereed literature |
|
Official statistics |
|
Scholarly books from reputable publishing houses |
|
What makes a weaker citation? |
|
Conference proceedings where unrefereed |
|
Newspapers |
|
|
|